The retailer said in its civil rights class-action lawsuit that it is suing for "establishing and maintaining an unlawful and unconstitutional penalty enforcement program, abusing emergency powers, and other actions that improperly assessed fines against businesses . " The complaint says the actions violate New York state and federal law.
The complaint said that the maximum fine under the law was originally $ 3,000 , but recent cases have seen fines as high as $ 15,000 .
City regulators said it failed to state the price before the inspection, the added costs to the sellers themselves or whether the goods could actually be purchased .
It was also pointed out that although the policy was intended to prevent price gouging during the epidemic , the arbitrary increase in fines was unacceptable to sellers.
The lawsuit also states: "Defendants' conduct , actions, and policies are willful in that they violate the federal and state constitutions, Plaintiffs' and Class Members' due process rights, and rights not to be subject to excessive penalties. "
Interestingly, however, the lawsuit also alleges that regulators unfairly use online prices as evidence of price gouging by city retailers:
“ Decisions are made based on big data, with computer printouts of online products used as evidence. Even though all products can be clearly shown as ‘ unavailable’ or ‘out of stock’, it is considered to be a means of price gouging. ”
Among other things, Defendants have compiled the selling prices of these covered merchandise from online vendors and large national store chains, most, if not all, of which are out of stock, and established guidelines for acceptable prices .
These guidelines were not released or provided to Union Square or any other similar participants before the issuance of subpoenas. Instead, they were revealed at sworn hearings in a legal ambush.
It is possible that some innocent sellers were implicated and punished, but during the epidemic, many online retailers used the method of pretending to be out of stock to drive up prices. The government proposed such penalties to protect consumers and maintain market order, but the fine amount soared from US$3,000 to US$15,000, and the increase was uncertain, so it is understandable that it caused dissatisfaction.
At present, the case has not been formally accepted, and the government has not responded to the incident. However, sellers need to be careful not to play tricks during the sales process and arbitrarily raise prices to avoid getting into trouble . USA Seller fine Price gouging |
<<: Walmart loses! Amazon becomes the largest apparel market in the United States
According to a new report from The Information , ...
Two years after workers at an Amazon warehouse in...
For cross-border e-commerce sellers, Dropshipping...
The warehouse is equipped with intelligent logist...
Cotopaxi is an American sustainable outdoor brand...
Amazon Seller Forums provide a place for Amazon s...
If we talk about which track can attract many big...
Klear (formerly known as Twtrland) is an influence...
Honestbee is an online grocery delivery service c...
Amazon launched an APP store (Amazon Marketplace ...
According to Weibo users, "100%" was su...
Seemingly insignificant categories often contain ...
Conversion rate is the ratio of the number of com...
WhatsApp is an application for communication betw...
Amazon backend crashed, what happened? Since the ...